Slim Sports

Pittsburgh Steelers at Cincinnati Bengals

Records, streaks and rest for this week are calculated from games played so far, so they will be out of date until the weeks before it are played.
PIT@CIN CIN -3.5 · O/U 47.5
PIT
Sunday 2026-11-15
8:20pm
NBC
48°F · wind 4 mph · 💧 13%
CIN
How to attack
PIT offense vs CIN defense
  • Get the tight end involvedMixedCIN ranks 29th vs tight ends in EPA per target: 73% caught, 9.3 yds per target, 89 per game. Best fits: Darnell Washington (14% of targets, 4 in the red zone).
    • Without S Bryan Cook (wk 4): 11.0 yds per target on 10 targets; with him 8.6 on 48; expected back
    • Darnell Washington on these targets: 28, 68% caught, 9.1 yds each (league 72%, 7.2)
    • CIN allowed more than league average per target in 5 of 7 games
    • Last 2 games CIN allowed 8.5 per target; 9.6 before
    Angleno rec yds line posted yet for Darnell Washington (the data leans over).
  • Red-zone stalls likelyPIT scores touchdowns on 50.0% of red-zone trips (28th); CIN allows them on 41.7% (3rd).
    • Chris Boswell: 18 of 23 on field goals, 4 of 7 from 50+, long 58; missed in wk 1, 2, 4, 6, 8
    • CIN allowed TDs on 10 of 24 trips (2/4, 0/4, 1/3, 1/2, 3/4, 0/3, 3/4 by game)
    • PIT scored TDs on 12 of 24 trips (1/2, 0/1, 1/3, 2/3, 2/2, 2/4, 1/4, 3/5 by game)
    Angleno FGs made line posted yet for Chris Boswell (the data leans over).
  • Attack the short leftSolidCIN gives up 7.6 yds per target to the short left (30th, 62 targets). DK Metcalf has 17 targets there this season.
    • DK Metcalf on these targets: 17, 41% caught, 2.2 yds each (league 70%, 5.9)
    • CIN allowed more than league average per target in 6 of 7 games
    • Last 2 games CIN allowed 8.3 per target; 7.2 before
    Angleno rec yds line posted yet for DK Metcalf (the data leans over).
CIN offense vs PIT defense
  • Attack the deep rightMixedPIT gives up 16.8 yds per target to the deep right (29th, 16 targets). Tee Higgins has 10 targets there this season.
    • Without CB Daylen Everette (wk 6, 7, 8): 17.2 yds per target on 5 targets; with him 10.5 on 4; expected back
    • Tee Higgins on these targets: 10, 70% caught, 17.4 yds each (league 40%, 11.3)
    AngleTee Higgins over 71.5 rec yds (-114 FD).
Motivation & storylines
  • StakesDivision game. PIT leads the AFC North by 0.5; PIT 6-2; CIN 5-2, 0.5 back.
  • HistoryLast met 2026 wk 3: PIT 30-27 at PIT.
  • History2025 series: Split (31-33 at CIN, 12-34 at PIT).
  • StreakPIT has won 4 straight.
  • SpotPIT off a bye; PIT won 27-6 vs CLE last week; CIN won 43-36 vs TEN in overtime last week.
ByeLast weekint'l ATL
@ PHINext week@ WAS
58OFF plays last game–
69DEF plays last game–
Miles flown, last 21 days
257 mi3rd27th8,261 mi
Stats from games played through week 8
EPA rank · adjusted
17thOffense4th
9thDefense15th
Schedule-adjusted matchup edges
+3.5 PIT vs CIN −3.5
travel257 mi, 21 days3rd27thtravel8,261 mi, 21 days
run DEF up front*4th20thrun blocking*
DEF vs 12 personnel*26th2nd12-personnel OFF*12 rate 2nd
man coverage*man rate 27th28th6thOFF vs man*
OFF vs the blitz30th9thblitzing DEFblitz rate 32nd
More schedule-adjusted matchup stats
Every matchup area, ranked 1-32, adjusted for opponents. Coloured when the two ranks are more than 5 apart. Pace & tendencies are plain. * Sharp Football Analysis.
+3.5 PIT vs CIN −3.5
PIT OFF vs CIN DEF
third-down OFF15th28ththird-down DEF
play-action OFFPA rate 29th7th19thplay-action DEF
big-play OFF22nd32ndbig-play DEF
run blocking*6th14thrun DEF up front*
protection vs no blitz20th11thpass rush w/o blitz
OFF vs zone*27th18thzone coverage*zone rate 30th
pass protection*12th6thpass rush*
pass OFF28th26thpass DEF
run OFF3rd8thrun DEF
early-down OFF17th16thearly-down DEF
OFF vs man*26th21stman coverage*man rate 3rd
11-personnel OFF*11 rate 8th16th20thDEF vs 11 personnel*
12-personnel OFF*12 rate 14th28th23rdDEF vs 12 personnel*
PIT DEF vs CIN OFF
pass rush w/o blitz10th24thprotection vs no blitz
run DEF2nd15thrun OFF
pass DEF16th2ndpass OFF
pass rush*17th3rdpass protection*
blitzing DEFblitz rate 20th28th15thOFF vs the blitz
early-down DEF12th3rdearly-down OFF
big-play DEF5th7thbig-play OFF
third-down DEF6th1stthird-down OFF
play-action DEF21st21stplay-action OFFPA rate 31st
zone coverage*zone rate 6th5th5thOFF vs zone*
DEF vs 11 personnel*6th7th11-personnel OFF*11 rate 25th
Pace & tendencies
29.9s13thSeconds between snaps18th30.4s
64.915thPlays per game21st63.4
+1.8%5thPass rate over expected1st+7.0%
7%11thNo-huddle rate17th5%
66%10thShotgun rate2nd77%
48%30thMotion rate27th50%
17%29thPlay-action rate31st15%
2.63s28thTime to throw*27th2.64s
64%8th11 personnel*25th50%
25%14th12 personnel*2nd44%
27%20thDEF blitz rate32nd18%
15%27thDEF man rate*3rd33%
62.921stPlays faced per game11th66.0
PIT away 2 ATS trends · 1 🔥
CIN home 4 ATS trends
Over / Under
5 trends

Run your own query on this matchup

Every other game this week: Week 10 2026 trends.

Gamble Responsibly. 21+ Historical trends, not predictions. Records are graded against the closing line at −110 assumed juice. Confirm every number and price at your book before betting. College Football betting trends by week and game. * Stats marked with an asterisk (pressure, run blocking, man/zone coverage, time to throw, personnel): Sharp Football Analysis.